Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 160 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 3 of 13 1 and Jane Doe 2. He and his own lawyer in a related state case, Jack Scarola, have been widely quoted by local and British press, making prejudicial and inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence betwee

nd inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence between the defense team and the government is not kept confidential, attorneys Scarola and Edwards could reasonably be expected to continue disseminating out-of-court publicity and making extrajudicial statements and commentary to the

ularized showing," as well as "rare and extraordinary circumstances" are required to overcome such a claim of privilege. In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F. Supp. 1529, 1536-37 (S.D. Fla. 1997) ("a highly particularized showing" is required to overcome a claim of privilege); ax v. Administrator U

The Last Word with O'Donnell — MSNBC (Jan. 8, 2015). Following these statements, on January 6, 2015, attorneys Edwards and Cassell, represented by Jack Scarola, Esq., filed a defamation action in Broward County Circuit Court. See Exhibit 11 at 1117 (alleging Dershowitz has "initiated a massive public media

ged information you would seek from me, I would then be able to decide whether to cooperate." See Exhibit 12 (emphasis added). On August 23, 2011, Scarola sent a letter to Dershowitz, explaining that there was no intent to inquire about attorney-client information, but adding: "[wje do, however, have r

ago, a building workman approached Mr. Epstein with news that the workman's wife needed a kidney transplant and that the workman's sister-in-law in Colombia was a willing donor. The non English speaking workman had neither the financial resources nor the know-how to get the sister-in-law to the United St

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 9 of 19 I and Jane Doe 2. Ile and his own lawyer in a related state case, Jack Scarola, have been widely quoted by local and British press, making prejudicial and inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence betwee

nd inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence between the defense team and the government is not kept confidential, attorneys Scarola and Edwards could reasonably be expected to continue disseminating out-of-court publicity and making extrajudicial statements and commentary to the

ularized showing," as well as "rare and extraordinary circumstances" arc required to overcome such a claim of privilege. In re Air Crash Near Cali, Colombia, 959 F. Supp. 1529, 1536-37 (S.D. Fla. 1997) ("a highly particularized showing" is required to overcome a claim of privilege); Cox v. Administrator

lorida, courthouse was even more surprising. 3 “There was a criminal extortion plot,” Alan Dershowitz told Brad | Edwards and Paul Cassell’s lawyer, Jack Scarola, on October 15, 2015. “Your clients were involved.” 2s an evening at home. a ng,” he explains. “A friend said she resent. Told me to wait in my mas

Dershowitz was swinging for the fences in his struggle to keep his hard-earned reputation afloat, he still had a bomb- shell to drop. When deposed by Scarola, he proposed his own theory about why Virginia Roberts had named him, along with Prince Andrew, as one of the men who had sexually abused her at Epst

just the two of them. An Roberts confided in Rebs mention me in any of the by her lawyer into doing : the object of this effort. T] aire who lives in Columb Secret and Limited Too. |} the name of that billionai yers hoped to get one billi dollars, or half of his net v had improperly engaged it Roberts. Th