Epstein Secrets

rosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims's lawyers on Monday, said they had recused themselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein's victims. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384 --- PAGE BREAK --- The reassignment means that the U.S. attorney for the Northern District

sexual gratification, but also for the sexual gratification of others." HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031385 --- PAGE BREAK --- The victims' attorneys - Edwards, Scarola and Paul Cassell - have asked the Justice Department to throw out Epstein's plea agreement and reopen the criminal investigation. Edwards, who brough

itiated in response to demands from a bipartisan group in Congress, led by Republican Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida. In the meantime, a court hearing will be held at 4 p.m. Wednesday in New York in another Epstein-related case. A federal appeals court wi

or www.phippsreporting.com (888)811-3408 EFTA00602439 649 651 1 APPEARANCES: 1 INDEX 2 2 3 On behalf of Plaintiffs: 3 SEARCY. DENNEY. SCAROLA Examination Page 4 BARNHART & SHIPLEY. P.A. 4 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard s West Palm Beach. Florida 33402-3626 5 VOLUME 5 (Pages 648 -

ion Page 4 BARNHART & SHIPLEY. P.A. 4 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard s West Palm Beach. Florida 33402-3626 5 VOLUME 5 (Pages 648 - 781) BY: JACK SCAROLA. ESQ. 6 7 6 jsx esearcyhw.com 7 Certificate of Oath 778 a On behalf of Defendant: Certificate of Reporter 779 9 COLE. SCOTT & KISSANE. P.A

:15 687:11 689:3 722:10,19 726:6 School (i) 703:14 722:9 707:20,20 695:12,16 Satz (1) 751:11 724:7 731:16 716:8 717:2 696:12,13,16 710:17 Schultz (1) 736:17 739:6 718:15 720:15 696:19,22 saw (2) 652:20 740:13 724:3 725:3,13 697:11,13,23 746:21 771:7 scope (2) secondary (1) 726:13 72

ve been retained by the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. to provide expert analys

eviewer for the journal Internet Research (http://info.emeraldinsight.com/authors/literati/index.htm) 2008 Best Paper, Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., and Schultz, C. (2008) The Effect of Brand on the Evaluation of IT System Performance. Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conferen

s Administrator www.phi sre orting.com EFTA00615804 335 337 1 APPEARANCES: 1 I N D EX 2 2 On behalf of Plaintiffs: 3 3 SEARCY. DENNEY. SCAROLA Examination Page 4 4 5 VOLUME 3 (Pages 334 - 461) 5 6 6 7 ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ 7 8 Direct (continued) By Mr. Edwards 341 a On behalf of

335:14 388:24 390:7 389:10,14 426:6 434:21 429:12 430:20 rough (1) 402:15 403:6,6 391:17 435:21 436:21 431:8,9 432:1 438:18 403:23 408:4,5 Schultz (1) 438:3 440:10 432:13 433:15 Roy (1) 408:7,10 412:1 339:10 441:10 442:5 sell (3) 444:10 425:10,11 scientists (1) 442:19 444:25 353:1 37

Unseal. 24 185-15. Copy of a transcript of the Scarola/Edwards 25 interview of April 7, 2011. Unseal i

al in full. 211. That's the reply to the motion. The portions mentioning Does 1 and 2 which appear at pages 2, 5, and 6 may be unsealed. 212. Ms. Schultz's declaration in support of the motion. The portions mentioning John Does 1 and 2 which appear at page 2 may be unsealed. 212-1. Doe no. 162's dep

Unseal. 24 185-15. Copy of a transcript of the Scarola/Edwards 25 interview of April 7, 2011. Unseal i

al in full. 211. That's the reply to the motion. The portions mentioning Does 1 and 2 which appear at pages 2, 5, and 6 may be unsealed. 212. Ms. Schultz's declaration in support of the motion. The portions mentioning John Does 1 and 2 which appear at page 2 may be unsealed. 212-1. Doe no. 162's dep