Epstein Secrets

u CtOpare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: 4 exhibit lists of Novenber 16th and Densber 22nd, SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 4 7 which, as I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 8 9 new

I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 8 9 new exhibits were added. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE 10 Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on 9 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

NBACH, ESQUIRE 5 new exhibit list was filed. If you compare the S By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE 6 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 4 7 exhibit lists of Hovenber 16th and Densber 22nd, which, as I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit

I said, are the same, with the March 5th 7 SHIPLEY, P.A. 8 exhibit list, 25 new exhibits -- excuse me -- 724 0 9 new exhibits were added. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE JO Your Honor held a hearing in this matter on 9 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE 11 Deowbor 5th and mud it cl

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

uite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 By KARA BERARD ROCKENBACH, ESQUIRE By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE For Defendant/counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 4 SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By

For Defendant/counter-Plaintiff: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART 4 SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE For Non-Parties L.N., E.M. 4 Jane Doe HATCH, JAMES 4 DODGE, P.C. 10 Nest Broadw

em. • presentation. I often refer to a case that I printed directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it talks about the trial judge's ultimate So this disk is not a disk of their privileged docunents. It's a disk of 27,500 documents. And wha

The Last Word with O'Donnell — MSNBC (Jan. 8, 2015). Following these statements, on January 6, 2015, attorneys Edwards and Cassell, represented by Jack Scarola, Esq., filed a defamation action in Broward County Circuit Court. See Exhibit 11 at 1117 (alleging Dershowitz has "initiated a massive public media

ged information you would seek from me, I would then be able to decide whether to cooperate." See Exhibit 12 (emphasis added). On August 23, 2011, Scarola sent a letter to Dershowitz, explaining that there was no intent to inquire about attorney-client information, but adding: "[wje do, however, have r

rshowitz for sexual purposes. Numerous courts have declined to allow a mere "reputational" interest to justify mandatory intervention. For example, Calloway" Westinghouse Eke. Cop., 115 F.R.D. 73 (M.D. Ga. 1987), denied a motion to intervene where the alleged interest was a doctor's "own reputation and

o the Court, Jane Doe #3’s Response takes remarkable liberties in describing what is claimed to be the law to Court. For example, the Response quotes Calloway v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 115 F.R.D. 73, 74 (M.D. Ga. 1987) for the proposition that “a witness’ interest in his reputation alone . . . does not c

to Intervene at 13.) In support of this allegation, Jane Doe #3 argues that her attorney in the instant matter, Bradley Edwards (through his attorney Jack Scarola) contacted Prof. Dershowitz to seek his voluntary cooperation in answering questions about Prof. Dershowitz’s client, Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct. Prof

atter, Bradley Edwards (through his attorney Jack Scarola) contacted Prof. Dershowitz to seek his voluntary