Epstein Secrets

01 By: JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT(S): nvNNEY, gCnvOLA, ot—aL 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE PA I \1 BEACH RBI,OkTINo SERVICE, INC. 561-fil -2995- PIIRS@PalmBeackRep?rting.com EFTA00617908 3 PROCEEDINGS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

MR. BREWER: Yes. They make reference to the Schwartzle case. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Interestingly enough, he was represented by Mr. Scarola. Also represented by me at one time or another. I know Kathy Schwartzle. In that case, they cite language that talks about, you don't know what th

RTING SERVICE, INC. 561-471-2995 PJW@PalTseacWPotftscp EFTA00617917 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Schwartzle versus Publix Super Markets is a case in which the appellate court, the Fourth DCA, was asked to address the issue of the inclusion of a confidentiality provision in a propos

z 22 EFTA00582670 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 9, 201 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiffs, and to Sigrid McCawley, Esquire, Boies Schiller & Flexner, counsel for Jane Doe No. 3, a

ing was sent via E- mail on May 9, 201 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for P

udgment action seeking to compel payments that the ex-husband owed under a previously entered final judgment dissolving their marriage. In Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), the Fourth District held that a party cannot issue an indiscriminate request to the attorney of a non-par

ail on May 6, 2015,46,; S-204544ar554046 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Pl

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E- mail on May 6, 2015,46,; S-204544ar554046 to: Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy Denny et al and counsel for Plaintiffs, and to Sigrid McCawley, Esquire, Boies Schiller & Flexner, counsel for Jane Doe No. 3, at

udgment action seeking to compel payments that the ex-husband owed under a previously entered final judgment dissolving their marriage. In Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), the Fourth District held that a party cannot issue an indiscriminate request to the attorney of a non-par