Epstein Secrets

cing a new criminal investigation and is involved in a civil suit with a lawyer." [Exhibit 1]. The source for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA0061623

ce for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00616236 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG a. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew,

his Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor, states: 1. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled "Convicted paedoph

oregoing was sent via U.S. Mail this y ay of April, 2011 to: Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; Jack Scarola, Esquire, Searcy, Denney & Scarola, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 3626, West Palm Beach, FL 33409, Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire

ce for much of that Article's information is Jack Scarola, Esq., counsel for the Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards. 2. In fact, Mr. Scarola is quoted to have said the following: EFTA00599554 CASE NO, 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMI1 AC; a. "We would be very keen to speak with Prince Andrew

his Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Opposing Counsel and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff From Making Extra-Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press, and, as grounds therefor, states: I. On March 11, 2011, the British publication "The Telegraph" published an article entitled "Convicted paedoph

r Deposition; n for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et from making Extra Judicial Statements and Co

uestions and Appear for Further Deposition; n for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et from making Extra Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press (Judge Crow) Motions: 1). Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; 2). Motion for Protective Order and Objections to Canceled Notice of Taking De

ion; 5). Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et Edwards from making Extra Judicial Statements

ear for Further Deposition; 5). Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Scarola Et Edwards from making Extra Judicial Statements and Commentary to the Media and Press (Judge Crow) Edwards' Motions: 1). Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; 2). Motion for Protective Order and Objections to Canceled Notice of