Epstein Secrets

By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0

SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0 not, there is ono agreed matter that we 10 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE 11 would ask the Court to address first. By KAREN TERRY

Appeal in my motion. And I understand 22 Mr. Edwards intends to rely upon it. But iS this was an authored decision by Judge 24 Melanie May from the Fourth DCA. And that 25 case has great language to guide this Court 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 20 21 22 23 24 IS 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 f

01 By: JACK GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT(S): nvNNEY, gCnvOLA, ot—aL 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE PA I \1 BEACH RBI,OkTINo SERVICE, INC. 561-fil -2995- PIIRS@PalmBeackRep?rting.com EFTA00617908 3 PROCEEDINGS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

MR. BREWER: Yes. They make reference to the Schwartzle case. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Interestingly enough, he was represented by Mr. Scarola. Also represented by me at one time or another. I know Kathy Schwartzle. In that case, they cite language that talks about, you don't know what th

00617917 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Schwartzle versus Publix Super Markets is a case in which the appellate court, the Fourth DCA, was asked to address the issue of the inclusion of a confidentiality provision in a proposal for settlement. What that opinion says is -- and thi

0792813 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MS. ROCKENBACH: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: Mr. Scarola? MR. SCAROLA: Yes, Your Honor. THE COURT: If I need them, I will ask for them. I have several bankers boxes' worth of materials here. I don't nee

se Fifth Amendment questions that were asked of my client -- THE COURT: No probative value. MS. ROCKENBACH: No probative value. And the Frazier -- the Fourth DCA says that even that adverse inference against parties when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them. If my c