Epstein Secrets

Court by using CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record on the attached service list. /s/Jack P Hill Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Jack P. Hill Florida Bar No.: 0547808 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard We

the attached service list. /s/Jack P Hill Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Jack P. Hill Florida B

e, C.M.A.'s treatment records from the Inc. and are protected by the psychotherapist-patient privilege pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923 3 EFTA00201395 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 4 of 8 C.M.A. vs. Epste

companion Guislaine Maxwell, and other high-profile names such as President Bill Clinton. Details are listed in more than 62 pages filed by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Edwards in the lawsuit Epstein filed against Edwards. Edwards represents four of Epstein’s minor victims, three of whom have settled th

sted in more than 62 pages filed by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Edwards in the lawsuit Epstein filed

ege is rooted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15 (1996}—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent discovery of the plea negotiatio

companion Guislaine Maxwell. and other high-profile names such as President Bill Clinton. Details are listed in more than 62 pages filed by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Edwards in the lawsuit Epstein filed against Edwards. Edwards represents four of Epstein's minor victims. three of whom have settled t

sted in more than 62 pages filed by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Edwards in the lawsuit Epstein file

lege is rooted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary bit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 I. 10-15 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent discovery of the plea negotiations