Epstein Secrets

ack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 ounse or a en an s Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Bruce E. Reinhart. P.A. Shiolev, P A West Palm beach, FL 3340

a en an s Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Bruce Reinhart, Esq.

as to the meaning of the statute would prevail over Plaintiffs view. See United States v. Santos 128 S.Ct. 2020, 2025 (2008). As summarized by the United States Supreme Court in Santos, supra, at 2025: ... The rule of lenity requires ambiguous criminal laws to be interpreted in favor of the defendants subjected to them.

on'a Haddad. PA Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 f acsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff EFTA00599836 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Sears Denne Scarola et al. est am eac i, Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc Nurik Es

VICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800)OOOCMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Sears Denne Scarola et al. est am eac i,

torney and pursuant to this Court's instruction today, hereby files this Notice of Filing Supplemental Authority. This filing contains the following United States Supreme Court Cases: Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984) and Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951), which were referenced by undersigned at today's

v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951). Please feel free to contact my office should any additional information be required. Yours Very Truly, cc: Jack Scarola, Esq. All parties on Service List Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. for the Firm EFTA00599838

mation be required. Yours Very Truly, cc: Jack Scarola, Esq. All parties on Service List Tonja Haddad

ein v. Rothstein. et at Dear Judge Crow: elephone facsimile As discussed in Court this morning, enclosed please find copies of the following two United States Supreme Court cases: Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984) and Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951). Please feel free to contact my office should an

d the videographer is Don Savoy, both from Esquire Deposition Solutions. Will counsel please announce their appearances for the record. MR. SCAROLA: Jack Scarola appearing on behalf of Bradley Edwards and Professor Paul Cassell. With me is Joni J. Jones from the Utah Attorney General's Office. MS. McCAWLEY: S

hat he was sexually trafficking. MR. SIMPSON: Move to strike the nonresponsive portion of the answer. Can I have the same standing objection, Mr. Scarola? MR. SCAROLA: No, I don't think -- I don't think you will need a standing objection. MR. SIMPSON: Well, I'll just make the objection there and --

act what I'm doing, but I was aware, since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerfu

ERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent via E-Serve to all Counsel on the attached list, this 23°°° day of November, 2015. /s/ Jack Scarola Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Attorney E-Mail(s): [email protected] and [email protected] Primary E-Mail: [email protected] Searc

altime Systems Administrator www. phippsreporting.com (888) 811-3408 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010783 APPEARANCES: On behalf of Plaintiffs: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33402-3626 BY: JACK SCAROLA, ESQ. [email protected] On behalf of

what I'm doing, but I was aware -- since the issue is, well, what's in the public record, I was aware that, you know, probably the most significant United States Supreme Court case argued in the last 20 years was Bush versus Gore, which was a case that essentially determined who was going to be President of the most powerfu