Epstein Secrets

this court enter an order denying the remaining contentions by the defendant in his Motion to Dismiss. Respectfully submitted, /.s/.lack P Frill JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No. 169440 JACK P. HILL Florida Bar No.: 0547808 ipley, P.A. West Palm Reach Floriea 33409 Attorneys for Plaintiff EFTA00201226 C

Respectfully submitted, /.s/.lack P Frill JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No. 169440 JACK P. HILL Florida Ba

For example, in Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) the court upheld an award of compensatory damages and punitive damages under the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) even though the language of TVPA provided no methodology for determining the amount or type of damages. The TVPA simply provides that "an in

s, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. reelrhwahotmail.com Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300

l for Plaintiff C.M.A. reelrhwahotmail.com Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarol

, Part III, p. 11-18). Plaintiff's reliance on Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), is misplaced as the federal statute at issue, the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), is clearly distinguishable. (Plaintiffs response, p. 11). See endnote 3 for relevant text.3 Unlike §2255 which expressly provides that a suc

case. EFTA00175316 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 3 of 4 Respectfully submitted, /c/.lank P Hill JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No. 169440 JACK P. HILL Florida Bar No.: 0547808 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Wes

01h Avenue North Suite 404 L 33461 Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff I.M.A. reelrhwAhotmail.com Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard ach, FL 33409 Fax: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 A

, Part III, p. 11-18). Plaintiff's reliance on Tachiona v. Mugabe, 216 F.Supp.2d 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2002), is misplaced as the federal statute at issue, the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA), is clearly distinguishable. (Plaintiffs response, p. 11). See endnote 3 for relevant text.' Unlike §2255 which expressly provides that a su