Epstein Secrets

o E-Mail s ; and rimary E-Mail: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev

tes case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Edwards only days before a scheduled

t e E-Mail ; and Primary E-Mail: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulev

tes case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Edwards only days before a scheduled

E-Mail: [email protected] Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes B

vernment's response to the Doe petition, confirming her belief that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") should be declared illegal and that the Federal Court should "direct the Government to proceed to negotiate a new agreement — in a process that respects Petitioner's (and the other victims') rights."'