Epstein Secrets

ink, Esq. Link &Rockenbach, PA. 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 301 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: Fax: Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 11517 Attorney E-Mails: Primary E-Mail: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhar

ruled we can't use them. We won't use them. MR. SCAROLA: Does that include Mr. Epstein? THE COURT: Does

al act (DE 6353 at II) — a claim that can only be fully assessed after he provides information under oath and the Court has a full factual record. The Eleventh Circuit has recently reaffirmed that bankruptcy courts have authority to impose both civil and criminal contempt sanctions. See In re McLean, 794 F.3d 1313,

, 2009 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.MA. Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barthian & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel fo

orth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.MA. Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola

). Citing to U.S. v. Lot 5, Fox Grove supra, the Southern District Court, Florida, in Ventura v. Broskv 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), stated — The Eleventh Circuit has also created a test for these circumstances, stating that where there exists a concurrent civil and criminal proceeding, a court must stay a ci

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 9 of 19 I and Jane Doe 2. Ile and his own lawyer in a related state case, Jack Scarola, have been widely quoted by local and British press, making prejudicial and inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence betwee

nd inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence between the defense team and the government is not kept confidential, attorneys Scarola and Edwards could reasonably be expected to continue disseminating out-of-court publicity and making extrajudicial statements and commentary to the

s confidential, and accordingly they should be made part of the Court's public file. In addition, no sealing order could be justified in this case. The Eleventh Circuit has instructed that the district courts must make substantial findings before sealing records in cases before it. For instance, in United States' O