Epstein Secrets

ives the privilege. United States v. Jones, 696 F.2d 1069, 1072 (4th Cir. 1982). The general rule applies here. On March 8, 2018, Edwards' counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were shared with Epstein's counsel by Mr. Scherer, counsel for Razorback. Thus, Edwards admits that he volu

es here. On March 8, 2018, Edwards' counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were sha

are foreign to the objectives underlying the work-product doctrine."). 9 EFTA00805375 Similarly, in In re Subpoenas Duces Tecum, 738 F.2d 1367 (D.C. Cir. 1984), a law firm performed an investigation of a corporation on the subject of whether improper payments had been made to domestic or foreign off

er young girls. She knew the civil lawsuits had to be based on the sexual abuse by Epstein. In a telephone interview conducted on April 7, 2011, by Jack Scarola, Esq., representing Brad Edwards, Esq. in Epstein'. Rothstein. Edwards. and L.M. Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG (Circuit Court, Palm Beach County,

one interview conducted on April 7, 2011, by Jack Scarola, Esq., representing Brad Edwards, Esq. in Epstei

s period in section 2401(a) "applies to all civil actions whether legal, equitable, or mixed." Spannaus U.S. Department of Justice 824 F.2d 52, 55 (D.C. Cir. I987)(citations omitted). Moreover, the Eleventh Circuit has recognized that, "[u]nlike an ordinary statute of limitations, § 2401(a) is a jurisdi

nvolving two other victims (Dkt 290.1, Dkt 311 at 12), and she was making herself publicly available by giving interviews to the and to Edwards and Scarola in 2011. She was an adult in 2008 (25) and 2011 (28). She has a responsibility to join the lawsuit prior to the completion of JE sentence. Principle

erful people. 50. In around April 2011, as a follow-up to my earlier call with Brad Edwards, I got a telephone call from him and another attorney, Jack Scarola. They just wanted general information about whether various people had information relevant to the lawsuit. They told me that they were taping the

by a grand jury investigating possible criminal violations is not part of a 'civil action.'"); Blair-Bey I. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036, 1039 (D.C. Cir.) (D.C. Cir. 1998) ("the courts have uniformly concluded that habeas corpus proceedings — and their cousins, section 2255 proceedings — are not 'civil actions"

1, 1 27. In her April 7, 2011 interview with Mr. Scarola, Jane Doe No. 3 stated that she was contacted in

construed. Center for Biological Diversity I. Hamilton, 453 F.3d 1331, 1334 (11th Cir. 2006), citing Spannaus I. Dept. of Justice 824 F.2d 52, 55 (D.C. Cir. 1987). "[A] waiver of the Government's sovereign immunity will be strictly construed, in terms of its scope, in favor of the sovereign." Lane'. Pe

11- 27. In her April 7, 2011 interview with Mr. Scarola, Jane Doe No. 3 stated that she was contacted in

ly construed. Center for Biological Diversity I. Hamilton 453 F.3d 1331, 1334 (116 Cir. 2006), dtkgi Spannaus I. Dept. of Justice, 824 F.2d 52, 55 (D.C. Cir. 1987). "[A] waiver of the Government's sovereign immunity will be strictly construed, in terms of its scope, in favor of the sovereign." Lane I. P

1, r 27. In her April 7, 2011 interview with Mr. Scarola, Jane Doe No. 3 stated that she was contacted in

construed. Center for Biological Diversity I. Hamilton, 453 F.3d 1331, 1334 (IP" Cir. 2006), citing Spannaus I. Dept. of Justice, 824 F.2d 52, 55 (D.C. Cir. 1987). "[A] waiver of the Government's sovereign immunity will be strictly construed, in terms of its scope, in favor of the sovereign." Lane'. Pe