Epstein Secrets

ley J. Edwards FLBN Brittany N. Henderson FLBN 118247 Edwards Pottinger LLC Attorneys for Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Jack Scarola, Esi= Florida Bar No. David P. Vitale, Florida Bar No. Attorney E-Mails' Primary E-Mail: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Attorney

laintiff/Counter-Defendant: ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE For Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs: SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE For Fowler White: CARLTON FIELDS, PA By JOSEPH IANNO, JR, ESQUIRE For L.M., E.W. and Jane Do

y questions about this subject during his deposition, as enumerated below. Relevant Legal Standards Under Federal Bankruptcy Rule 7030, Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies in adversary bankruptcy proceedings of this type. Under Rule 30, a deponent can refuse to answer questions only to protect a priv

nvolving two other victims (Dkt 290.1, Dkt 311 at 12), and she was making herself publicly available by giving interviews to the and to Edwards and Scarola in 2011. She was an adult in 2008 (25) and 2011 (28). She has a responsibility to join the lawsuit prior to the completion of JE sentence. Principle

erful people. 50. In around April 2011, as a follow-up to my earlier call with Brad Edwards, I got a telephone call from him and another attorney, Jack Scarola. They just wanted general information about whether various people had information relevant to the lawsuit. They told me that they were taping the

orcement proceeding because it is not a "civil action" against the Government. To be sure, this Court has determined that convenience dictates that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding." See DE 257 at 3. But that procedural determination does not alter the substance of this ca

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 9 of 19 I and Jane Doe 2. Ile and his own lawyer in a related state case, Jack Scarola, have been widely quoted by local and British press, making prejudicial and inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence betwee

nd inflammatory statements about Mr. Epstein. If the correspondence between the defense team and the government is not kept confidential, attorneys Scarola and Edwards could reasonably be expected to continue disseminating out-of-court publicity and making extrajudicial statements and commentary to the

rs. III. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g