Epstein Secrets

up her claims. Still, Hafele gave Coleman extra time to respond to various motions that he will have to decide before the case goes to trial. Despite Searola's insistence that Edwards had nothing to do with Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, Coleman said the evidence indicates, otherwise. Why else would he try to d

deral act, is unique, he said. "We are treading· _on virgin ground, to use-what is probably an 'inappropriate phrase in this situation," he said . .Scarola said he arid Edwards will ask that the non- prosecution agreement be thrown out., Tha,t would op7n the. possibility thanhe long-she'Ived federal ind

investiga,te and prosecute Epstein in the way tl:u1t shoµld h_ave qccµrred in Florida:. over a decade ago, 11 Reiter said in a. statement. Anc;i, Scarol~ said,_ there are signals that ~ennan's inve.stigatiori is fai: from over. Berman declined to answer questions about whether.others,· such as,Epstein

ents, to answer questions,posed by Epstein’s attorneys. “Brilliant move on their part,” he said. Even if Epstein’s attorneys hadn’t: opened the door, Scarola said the information would have likely come out. He says th&information will help him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegat

by other young women against Epstein, claiming he paid them for sex • ·• .. : .. :.,_>_, ____ ; when some were as yotmg as 14years old. Attorney Jack Scarola, who is tepresenting Edwards, said his client was compelledto divulge the confidential settlements to answer questfons. posed by 'Epstein's attorney

and creditors said they were pleased with the outcome, "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people . ,. who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaumj a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the-most for c

to answer q~estions, As he did in the civil. lawsuits, Epstein has :invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when que~tfoned by Scarola-. Edwards ha:s claimed that much of the infc;>Jmati_on Epstein is se:eking is J)'rotected by attorney-client privilege. The n;ialicioµs prosec::µti

" other young women ,against Epstein, claiming he paid them for sex "f• .•. ·-· ,,_ • .. ,. _.J} when some were as young as l4 years old. Attorney Jack Scarola, who is representing Edw2,rds1 said his client was c.orn:pelled to divulge the confidential settlements to answer q~estions posed by'Epstein's-attor

and creditors said they were pleased with the outcome. "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people .. . who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the most for c

hly two dozen lawsuits filed by other young women against Epstein, claiming he paid them for sex when some were as young as 14 years old. Attorney Jack Scarola, who is representing Edwards, said his client was compelled to divulge the confidential settlements to answer questions posed by Epstein's attorneys

ents to answer questions posed by Epstein's attorneys. "Brilliant move on their part," he said. Even if Epstein's attorneys hadn't opened the door, Scarola said the information would have likely come out. He says the information will help him undermine Epstein's claims that Edwards "ginned up" the alle

nd creditors said they were pleased with the outcome. "We knew we were dealing with some substantial people ... who were going to bid it up a bit," Luzinski said. "The system worked," said Charles Tatelbaum, a lawyer for creditor JPMorgan Chase Bank. "In bankruptcy court, the idea is to get the most for

da Bar No.: 132896 FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARD FIT LEHRMAN P.L. 16 EFTA00708308 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 0410811 Page 17 of 23 Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards in the matter of Epstein v. Edwards, et at Ca

T LEHRMAN P.L. 16 EFTA00708308 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 0410811 Page 17 of 23 Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards in the matter of Epstein v. Edwards, et at Case No.: 502009C40408000CCaMBAG 17 EFTA00708309

. Indeed, the obligation to produce a privilege log is not even triggered until there has been an initial determination of relevancy. See Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (Fla. App. 2006) ("Before a written objection to a request for production of documents is ruled upon, the documents are not 'ot

ebrua , 2011. Jack Sc Florid. o.: Sear P nne Scarola Barnhart & Shipley W st Palm Beach Florida 33409

exceed the scope. The Court must rule on the objections and the scope of discovery before Defendant has any duty to file a privilege log. Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (4th DCA 2006). "A party is required to file a log only if the information is `otherwise discoverable!" Gosman at 296 (referri

2011. Jack Sc Florid. o.: 169440 Sear. nney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 21 alm Beach Lakes Boulevard

exceed the scope. The Court must rule on the objections and the scope of discovery before Defendant has any duty to file a privilege log. Gosman v. Luzinski, 937 So.2d 293, 296 (4th DCA 2006). "A party is required to file a log only if the information is `otherwise discoverable!" Gosman at 296 (referri