Epstein Secrets

up her claims. Still, Hafele gave Coleman extra time to respond to various motions that he will have to decide before the case goes to trial. Despite Searola's insistence that Edwards had nothing to do with Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, Coleman said the evidence indicates, otherwise. Why else would he try to d

deral act, is unique, he said. "We are treading· _on virgin ground, to use-what is probably an 'inappropriate phrase in this situation," he said . .Scarola said he arid Edwards will ask that the non- prosecution agreement be thrown out., Tha,t would op7n the. possibility thanhe long-she'Ived federal ind

investiga,te and prosecute Epstein in the way tl:u1t shoµld h_ave qccµrred in Florida:. over a decade ago, 11 Reiter said in a. statement. Anc;i, Scarol~ said,_ there are signals that ~ennan's inve.stigatiori is fai: from over. Berman declined to answer questions about whether.others,· such as,Epstein

ents, to answer questions,posed by Epstein’s attorneys. “Brilliant move on their part,” he said. Even if Epstein’s attorneys hadn’t: opened the door, Scarola said the information would have likely come out. He says th&information will help him undermine Epstein’s claims that Edwards “ginned up” the allegat

by other young women against Epstein, claiming he paid them for sex • ·• .. : .. :.,_>_, ____ ; when some were as yotmg as 14years old. Attorney Jack Scarola, who is tepresenting Edwards, said his client was compelledto divulge the confidential settlements to answer questfons. posed by 'Epstein's attorney

2001, con~ending thatthe assessmentof.his home exceedeqi(s fair market v:ilµe. He dismissec:l his lawsuit in December2002. A profile of Epstein in VanityFait magazine.said he owns what are believed to betheJargest private homes in Manhattan - s·I:,000 square feet - and in.New Mexico - .a 7,500-a.cre ranc

to answer q~estions, As he did in the civil. lawsuits, Epstein has :invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when que~tfoned by Scarola-. Edwards ha:s claimed that much of the infc;>Jmati_on Epstein is se:eking is J)'rotected by attorney-client privilege. The n;ialicioµs prosec::µti

" other young women ,against Epstein, claiming he paid them for sex "f• .•. ·-· ,,_ • .. ,. _.J} when some were as young as l4 years old. Attorney Jack Scarola, who is representing Edw2,rds1 said his client was c.orn:pelled to divulge the confidential settlements to answer q~estions posed by'Epstein's-attor

2001, contending that the assessment of his home exceeded its. fair market value. He dismissed his lawsuit in December 2002. A profile of Epstein in VanityFair magazine said he owns what are believed to be the largest private homes in Manhattan - 51,000 square feet -and in New Mexico - a 7,500-acre ranch. Th

for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola

-80993, Paul G. Cassell, Esq. 08-80994 Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. Pro Hac Vice [email protected] Co-counsel f

rtions in his affidavit are based on a 2005 Vanity Fair article (the "2005 Vanity Fair Article"). See Vicky Ward, "The Talented Mr. Epstein," Vanity Fair chttp://vickyward.com/wordpress/archives/30> (January 24, 2005; accessed June 24, 2009). Mr. Cassell's affidavit is essentially a recitation of irr