Epstein Secrets

06/06/2012 PtChle°S of 22 Tonja Haddad Coleman From: Tonja Haddad Coleman Sent: Tuesday. May 29, 2012 10:47 AM To: 'Mary E. Pirrotta' Cc: 'Jack Scarola' Subject: RE: Edwards adv. Epstein Jack: To avoid any further miscommunications, misunderstandings, attempts to circumvent or delay the legal proc

an From: Sent: To: Subject: Thank you. Jack Scarola Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:41 PM Re: Epstein disco

such, when a party fails to comply with a pretrial order, a court has broad discretion in determining sanctions. First Republic Corp. of America v. Hayes, 431 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Accordingly, Defendant Edwards' inapposite and patent disregard for this Court's Order mandates sanctions. Fina

: Primary: Second. Second. Second. Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel

Second. Second (FBN Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00793363 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. .-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Pl

ase law." Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., Inc., 990 So. 2d 639, 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Johnson v. State, 863 So. 2d 271, 278 (Fla. 2003)); Hayes v. Wal- Man Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124, 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); DeVille v. State, 917 So. 2d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 4`h DCA 2006); Dixon v. State, 911

iss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: [email protected]; and [email protected]

61)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale,

on-compliance with orders of the Court constitutes civil contempt if the party has not in good faith made all reasonable efforts to comply. U.S. v. Hayes. 722 F.2d 723, 725 (11th Cir. 1984). However, "if the court finds the defendant acted willfully or maliciously in disregarding the injunction, then

RVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Be

neys for Epstein 24 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585443 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . Atte ury, o erger, c Weiss, PA 2

case law." Thigpen v. United Parcel Servs., Inc., 990 So. 2d 639, 645 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Johnston v. State, 863 So.2d 271, 278 (Fla.2003); Hayes v. Wal- Mart Stores, Inc., 933 So. 2d 124, 126 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Deville v. State, 917 So. 2d 1058, 1059 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Dixon v. State, 911