Epstein Secrets

vants claim that current counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in a pending state court case (Scott Link, Esq.) sent counsel for Bradley Edwards in that case (Jack Scarola, Esq.) a flash drive which purported to duplicate "the disc we located in Fowler White's files." DE 6326,1 24. Movants contend that the flash drive

to all registered users on the CM/ECF system, which includes counsel identified on the service list below. SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Sears Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. yard Counsel for Bradley J. Edwards Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Counsel for

uous order must be made before the burden shifts to the alleged contemnor to produce evidence explaining his noncompliance at a show cause hearing. Burgess, 143 F.3d at 1436. "Clear and convincing evidence entails proof that a claim is 'highly probable,' a standard requiring more than a preponderance o

iss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale, Jr., Esq. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Attorney E-Mails: [email protected]; and [email protected]

61)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 169440 David P. Vitale,

"[a] petitioner `must [first] establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated [a] court's earlier order." Chairs v. Burgess, 143 F.3d 1432. 1436 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698. 700 (1 I th Cir. 1988)). Once such a prima facie showing of c

The Last Word with O'Donnell — MSNBC (Jan. 8, 2015). Following these statements, on January 6, 2015, attorneys Edwards and Cassell, represented by Jack Scarola, Esq., filed a defamation action in Broward County Circuit Court. See Exhibit 11 at 1117 (alleging Dershowitz has "initiated a massive public media

ged information you would seek from me, I would then be able to decide whether to cooperate." See Exhibit 12 (emphasis added). On August 23, 2011, Scarola sent a letter to Dershowitz, explaining that there was no intent to inquire about attorney-client information, but adding: "[wje do, however, have r

11th Cir. 1999); United States , Pali!, supra, 338 F. d 1299 (11'h Cir. 2003); United States Garrett, 190 F.3 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States Burgess, 175 F.3d 261 (116 Cir. 1999); United States' Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States' Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). Unit