Epstein Secrets

— including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request all written and oral communications and other document

Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

— including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request all written and oral communications and other document

Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

— including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request all written and oral communications and other document

Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

— including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request all written and oral communications and other document

Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr

— including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request all written and oral communications and other document

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

— including , but not limited to, Bradley Edwards, David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Peter Skinner, Stanley Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr. Epstein and/or Ms. Maxwell. 14. We request all written and oral communications and other document

Pottinger, Paul Cassell, Spencer Kuvin, and Jack Scarola (the "Attorneys") — concerning or relating to Mr

r, 851 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1988). 8. Contradictory Statements: We request all prior contradictory statements of any prospective government witness. Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (1967). 9. Statements Relevant to the Defense: We request disclosure of any statement that may be "relevant to any possibl

ve been retained by the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA. to provide expert analys

nagement (ISCRAM 2011), 8-11 May, Lisbon, Portugal. Caragea, C., McNeese, N., Jaiswal, A., Traylor, G., Kim, H.W., Mitra, P., Wu, D., Tapia, A.H., Giles, I., Jansen, B.J., and Yen, J. (2011) Classifying Text Messages for the Haiti Earthquake. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Informa