Epstein Secrets

EREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 11th day of February , 2009: Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart & Jack Alan Goldberger Phone Phone Fax Fax Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

s on this 11th day of February , 2009: Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola

m Beach, and Robert M. Moletteire, of Graham, Moletteire, 'futile & Torpy, PA., Melbourne, for Respondents. HARRIS, J. Gary and Joellen Parrish ("Parrish") sued State Farm as their uninsured motorist carrier. Since there were two policies involved, Parrish claimed that the policy coverage for each p

process concerning the stacking cover- age option was handled by State Fann, apparently to see if there was any basis to avoid the con- sequence of Parrish's previous selection. When the trial court ordered the production, State Farm filed its certiorari petition urging that the discovery re- quest was

EREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 11th day of February , 2009: Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Bamhart & Counsel for Plaintiff Co-C

s on this 11th day of February , 2009: Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarol

nt Beach, and Robert M. Moletterre, o Graham, Moletteire, 'futile & Torpy, PA., Melbourne, for Respondents. HARRIS, J. Gary and Joellen Parrish ("Parrish") sued State Farm as their uninsured motorist carrier. Since there were two policies involved, Parrish claimed that the policy coverage for each p

process concerning the stacking cover- age option was handled by State Fenn, apparently to see if there was any basis to avoid the con- sequence of Parrish's previous selection. When the trial court ordered the production, State Farm filed its certiorari petition urging that the discovery re- quest was

afele, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on March 12, 2018. Jack Scarola, Esq. Karen Terry, Esq. David J. Vitale, Jr. Esq. SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL

GENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes

States, 4 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) Labor Ready Se. Inc. v. Australian Warehouses Condo. ffi, 14, 16, 17 962 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) Parrish v. Dougherty, 14 505 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) Pleus v. Crist, 22 14 So.3d 941 (Fla.2009) Poole v. City of Port Orange, 1 33 So.3d 739 (F

93746 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Pla

E I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwar

party may waive its objection to an order setting trial, "notwithstanding the compulsory nature of rule 1.440." 170 So. 3d at 130. "For example, in Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the appellant's attorney appeared at the trial and participated without objecting to the manner i

0793784 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Motion was furnished via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 1 o- ounse or

shed via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-

party may waive its objection to an order setting trial, "notwithstanding the compulsory nature of rule 1.440." 170 So. 3d at 130. "For example, in Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the appellant's attorney appeared at the trial and participated without objecting to the manner i