Epstein Secrets

0808486 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Reply was furnished via email this 19th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, . 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 C

correct copy of this Reply was furnished via email this 19th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, . 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley I Edwards

ice for trial, and the trial judge is ultimately responsible for ensuring compliance with the rule. The following excerpt from the First District's Bennett decision "succinctly encapsulates" what occurred here: The requirement of notice is mandatory. . . . The procedure for setting actions for trial i

afele, 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10.1216, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and to all counsel on the attached service list, by email, on March 12, 2018. Jack Scarola, Esq. Karen Terry, Esq. David J. Vitale, Jr. Esq. SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL

GENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes

Epstein here, the plaintiff argued that strict compliance with Rule 1.440 was required. The plaintiff relied upon a previous First District opinion, Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc., 492 So.2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), in which the court adopted a bright line rule that strict compliance with Rule 1

rder. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 12th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. o- ounse en yard an counter- PlainOT Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Bu

FY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 12th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. o- ounse en yard an counter- PlainOT Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlin ton & Rockenbach P.A. 350 Co-Coun

because there was no default against Rothstein on the operative complaint. Florida law is clear: "strict compliance with rule 1.440 is mandatory." Bennett v. Cont'l Chemicals, Inc., 492 So. 2d 724, 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (emphasis added).6 At the earliest opportunity on the next business day, Monday,

93746 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Pla

E I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 8'h day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Sears , Denn , Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. and i 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwar

se for trial, the "action" is not "at issue" when Edwards made his request. Florida law is clear: "strict compliance with rule 1.440 is mandatory." Bennett v. Cont'l Chemicals, Inc., 492 So. 2d 724, 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (emphasis added). Accord Teelucksingh v. Teelucksingh, 21 So. 3d 37, 37 (Fla. 2d

0793784 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Motion was furnished via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 1 o- ounse or

shed via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-

set 5 EFTA00793771 the cause for trial, the "action" was not "at issue." Florida law is clear: "strict compliance with rule 1.440 is mandatory." Bennett v. Cont'l Chemicals, Inc., 492 So. 2d 724, 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (emphasis added). Accord Teelucksingh v. Teelucksingh, 21 So. 3d 37, 37 (Fla. 2d

By SCOTT J. LINK, ESQUIRE ^ docket relative to Florida Rule of Civil 9 For Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff: Procedure 1.440 first. SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0

SEARCY, DENNEY, SCAROLA, BARNHART C 8 SHIPLEY, P.A. e MR. SCAROLA: Good morning, Your Honor. With the Court's permission, believe it or 9 By JACK SCAROLA, ESQUIRE :0 not, there is ono agreed matter that we 10 By DAVID P. VITALE JR., ESQUIRE 11 would ask the Court to address first. By KAREN TERRY

DCA case recognizing the 16 mandatory nature and compliance, strict 17 compliance with Rule 1.440.• Judge May 14 wrote, 'we don't quarrel with Bennett versus 19 Continental Chemicals.• 20 However, we point out that none of 21 those cases involve the case that has boon 22 pending at issue for

Unseal. 24 185-15. Copy of a transcript of the Scarola/Edwards 25 interview of April 7, 2011. Unseal i

, issues or arguments not previously presented to the Court, nor may it be used as a vehicle for relitigating issues already decided by the Court." Bennett v. Watson Wyatt & Co., 156 F. Supp.2d 270, 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). Here, Ms. Maxwell's request for reconsideration hinges on her assertion that new d