Epstein Secrets

s, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. reelrhwahotmail.com Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300

l for Plaintiff C.M.A. reelrhwahotmail.com Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarol

of the statute is to impose punishment that is criminal in nature, the ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §

Court by using CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record on the attached service list. istlank P Hill Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: Jack P. Hill Florida Bar No.: Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm 6409 P

the attached service list. istlank P Hill Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: Jack P. Hill Florida Bar No.:

ve) was distributed as a public service by San Francisco Community Mental Health Services and the Oakland Bureau of Education to 11,000 teachers in Oakland and San Francisco. 47. Marin Psychoanalytic Society: (April 1990) "Simultaneous child and couple therapy: emergence and interpretation of congruent

case. EFTA00175316 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 113 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 3 of 4 Respectfully submitted, /c/.lank P Hill JACK SCAROLA Florida Bar No. 169440 JACK P. HILL Florida Bar No.: 0547808 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Wes

01h Avenue North Suite 404 L 33461 Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff I.M.A. reelrhwAhotmail.com Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard ach, FL 33409 Fax: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 A

of the statute is to impose punishment that is criminal in nature, the ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §