Epstein Secrets

14 Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we 15 have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking 16 that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. 17 As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case 18 was when Ms. then known as Jane Doe Number

o your Honor. We are asking 16 that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. 17 As your Hono

against 10 him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's 11 statements against my client. 12 The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, 13 goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have 14 to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. 15 And s

14 Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we 15 have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking 16 that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. 17 As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case 18 was when Ms. , then known as Jane Doe Numbe

o your Honor. We are asking 16 that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. 17 As your Hono

y my client against him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's statements against my client. The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. And so, your Hono

you already. Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. As your Honor is well aware, the triggering event in this case was when Ms. Giuffre, then known as Jane Doe Number 3,

ed to your Honor. We are asking that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. As your Honor is

by my client against him, and what's at issue in this case is, again, Maxwell's statements against my client. The case that they cite actually, the Minemyer case, goes against them. It actually talks about how you would have to call the reporter, that that couldn't come into evidence. And so, your Hono

ible (Motion in Limine 18) oo. eeeesseesseceseesseesseceseesseesseceseesseeeseeeseeessesseessaeeseecseeesaeesaecsseesseeseeeeeeseessees 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19)... eee 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with R

eeseecseeesaeesaecsseesseeseeeeeeseessees 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Li

7 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999)... eee 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.Ala. 1992)... cece ee eee ee ee eee 3 Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. IIL Feb. 6, 2012) oo eeeeseseessesscssenecrscsecseesecsesessesesseseesses

and admissible (Motion in Limine 18) ooo... cecccecccccccccesscececsseececsseeeceseescesseesssueescnsssescesseessesssesensseeesssaeeess 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 19).................00. 29 20. The transcript of the tape recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s convers

sueescnsssescesseessesssesensseeesssaeeess 26 19. Judge Marra’s ruling is relevant and admissible (Motion in Li

ss'n, 237 Mich. App. 1, 12, 602 N.W.2d 233, 239 (1999)... 13 Longmire v. Ala. State Univ., 151 F.R.D. 414, 419 (M.D.Ala. 1992). 000.00. cece cee ed Minemyer v. R-Boc Representatives, Inc., No. 07 C 1763, 2012 WL 379904, at *4 (N.D. ILL. Feb. 6, 2012) oe ceecceececcecccecceseeecesecsecseeceeeseesecseesaec