Epstein Secrets

r Rule 21, Doe v. United States, No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2016). 7. Attached as

d be permitted to join Petitioners’ claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they were known victims of Mr. Epstein and the Governme

Florida, this 6" day of April, 2015. ea fo “in KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 GIUFFRE002853

r Rule 21, Doe v. United States, No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2016). I declare under

d be permitted to join Petitioners’ claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they were known victims of Mr. Epstein and the Governme

16, 39, and 49. " DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6" day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014856

letters.” September: U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra rejects the U.S. Attorney’s Office argument that

es of sending Epstein to prison. They accuse federal prosecutors of deceiving them with “false notification letters.” September: U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra rejects the U.S. Attorney’s Office argument that it was under no obligation to notify victims prior to striking a non- prosecution agreement with Eps

t he was vindicated. However, the judge does not address the veracity of Roberts’ claims, writing: “The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim.” September: Roberts sues Maxwell in federal court in New York, cl