Epstein Secrets

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED

even applies. In any event, it is obvious that grand jury secrecy only extends to matters that occurred in secret before the grand jury. See, e.g., Blalock. United States, 844 F.2d 1546, 1551 (11th Cir. 1988) ("Rule 6(e)(2) only protects information revealing what has occurred, or will occur, inside th

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED

Statest Frazier, 944 F.2d 820, 825 (11th Cir. 1991) (even a witness who testifies before a grand jury is not required to keep his testimony secret); Blalock' United States, 844 F.2d 1546, 1551 (11th Cir. 1988) ("Rule 6(e)(2) only protects information revealing what has occurred, or will occur, inside th

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED

tates.. Frazier, 944 F.2d 820, 825 (11th Cir. 1991) (even a witness who testifies before a grand jury is not required to keep his testimony secret); Blalock'. United States, 844 F.2d 1546, 1551 (11th Cir. 1988) ("Rule 6(e)(2) only protects information revealing what has occurred, or will occur, inside t

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

overnment actors subject to the Rule 6(e) disclosure prohibition. See, e.g., United States v. Barry, 865 F.2d 1317 (D.C.Cir. 1989); United States v. Blalock, 844 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1988); Eisenberg, supra. If, as in these cases, private individuals may be entitled to relief after there has been a Rule

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED

ates v. Frazier, 944 F.2d 820, 825 (11th Cir. 1991) (even a witness who testifies before a grand jury is not required to keep his testimony secret); Blalock v. United Slates, 844 F.2d 1546, 1551 (11th Cir. 1988) ("Rule 6(e)(2) only protects information revealing what has occurred, or will occur, inside

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

vernment actors subject to the Rule 6(e) disclosure prohibition. See, e.g., United States v. Barry, 865 F.2d 1317 (D.C.Cir. 1989); United States it Blalock, 844 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1988); Eisenberg, supra. If, as in these cases, private individuals may be entitled to relief after there has been a Rule

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

vernment actors subject to the Rule 6(e) disclosure prohibition. See, e.g., United States v. Barry, 865 F.2d 1317 (D.C.Cir. 1989); United States v. Blalock, 844 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1988); Eisenberg, supra. If, as in these cases, private individuals may be entitled to relief after there has been a Rule