Epstein Secrets

ir identity will be indicated by their initials. 6) This Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders. 7) The disdosure of the sealed documents shall be stayed at least until June 26, 2009, at 9:00 a.m., at which time the Court will

attempting to march up 15 the wrong hill here, your Honor. 16 This matter needs to -- has to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matter. Now, at our last 20 abbreviated hearing two weeks ago, I told 21 you for the first time that

to be 17 litigated in federal court before 18 Judge Marra who has already heard hearings 19 on this matte

o make. 4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you, your 5 Honor. As to the last argument made by 6 Ms. Burns as to the applicability of 7 Federal Rule 6 of the Rules of Federal 8 Criminal Procedure it's something that we 9 learned in the law school that the 10 supremacy clause controls and to the extent 11 there's a

go first? 14 MS. SHULLMAN: Mr. Edwards. 15 THE COURT: Mr. Edwards. 16 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, inasmuch as 17 Mr. Epstein is relying on Judge Marra's 18 order to support the argument that the 19 nonprosecution agreement needs to remain 20 sealed, I'd like to address that if you are 21 inc

omity, your Honor, 4 this Court should defer to Judge Marra 5 because, A, he has already ruled on the 6 d

o make. 4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you, your 5 Honor. As to the last argument made by 6 Ms. Burns as to the applicability of 7 Federal Rule 6 of the Rules of Federal 8 Criminal Procedure it's something that we 9 learned in the law school that the 10 supremacy clause controls and to the extent 11 there's a

is 24 Court should defer to the rulings of 25 Judge Marra already. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COUR

e 22 and that in our mind is equally important 23 as the fact in the interest of comity this 24 Court should defer to the rulings of 25 Judge Marra already. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00231387 41 1 As to Mr. Kuvin's argument that he 2 has a client that is in sta

o make. 4 MR. GOLDBERGER: Thank you, your 5 Honor. As to the last argument made by 6 Ms. Burns as to the applicability of 7 Federal Rule 6 of the Rules of Federal 8 Criminal Procedure it's something that we 9 learned in the law school that the 10 supremacy clause controls and to the extent 11 there's a