Epstein Secrets

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, VS.

Congress . . . The elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality." DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 (1988). B. Recognition of a Privilege Under Rule 501. The Court rejected intervenors' cont

e original message. Thank you. 240 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB-001744 EFTA00184602 Case 9:08-cv-8073

long as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the .• intent of Con ess. United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing . DeBartolo Corp. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Thades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988). At c least, to eliminate questions as to its constitutionality, §2422(b)

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

f Congress ... The elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality." DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 (1988). B. Recognition of a Privilege Under Rule 501. The Court rejected intervenors' cont

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

Congress . . . The elementary rule is that every reasonable construction must be resorted to, in order to save a statute from unconstitutionality." DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568, 575 (1988). B. Recognition of a Privilege Under Rule 501. The Court rejected intervenors' cont

ect the strength of ow case, Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-011947 EFTA00226735 Ltd' tu0 .244CAIYU 0:r

as such a reading is not plainly contrary to the intent of Congress United States X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64, 78 (1994), citing Edward." DeBartolo Corp. Florida GulfCoast Building & Constr. Trades Council, 485 U.S. 568 (1988). At e least, to eliminate questions as to its constitutionality, §2422(b)