Epstein Secrets

ubx YES iN COMPLAINT O UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 complaint: JURY DEMAND: . go NO Vill. RELATED (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein 3-W-O*€ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR OF

(SEE ATTACHED) : CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Jane Doe

Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. . COUNT It Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe’s Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27, Epstein’s tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cau

s, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 80Q69 CIV-MARRA WaLSTRATE 111116B IONNSON FILED by INTAKE JA

pstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate c

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE'

just and proper. Page 4 of 6 EFTA00234039 Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 5-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 6 of 7 COUNT H Loss of Parental Consortium 19. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Mother repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 13 above. 20. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cau

vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. OS-8 0 69 CIV-MARRA MAWSTRAIE JOHNSON FILED by INTAKE JAN 2 4 2%

pstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 16 above. 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate c

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE'

ms just and proper. Page 4 of 6 EFTA00313585 Case 9:08-cv-80069-KAM Document 5-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/29/2008 Page 6 of 7 COUNT II Loss of Parental Consortium 19. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Mother repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 13 above. 20. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cau

vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Ot3-80069 cl■.MARRA MAOIST COMPLAINT Plaintiff; Jane Doe No. 1 ("J

pstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate c

vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 08-80069 GIV-MARRA £fl JUDO JOHNSON FILED by ITAKE JAN 2 4 200

pstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate c

oe No. 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80232-Marra/Johnson, United States District Court for the So

pstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above. 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate c