Epstein Secrets

"an express confidentiality provision." In opposing the Motion to Unseal the NPA that was filed by Jane Doe, you stated that you had informed Judge Marra of the confidentiality provision during an earlier telephonic status conference occurring on August 14, 2008 which "the United States was obligated

E DOE, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, vs. JUNE 12, 2009 7 8 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 9 Defendant. 10 11 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 15 18205 Biscayne Bou

ed by Jane Doe, you stated that you had informed Judge Marra of the confidentiality provision during an earlie

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

d Cases PI TES ONO 08- 08-80380, 08.80381 JUDGE MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-80736 VII. CAUSE OF ACTION C

Related Cases PI TES ONO 08- 08-80380, 08.80381 JUDGE MARRA DOCKET NUMBER 08-80736 VII. CAUSE OF ACTION C

4; Jane Doe No. 4 at D.E. 1 ¶ 4; Jane Doe No. Sat D.E. 1 ¶ 4. 3. There is complete diversity. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1,

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE N1,

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, aik/a JANE DOE #1,

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

orl144 coat eft G INA! Tel WOO* tern un0Intril re:et prbplikals µ elnb tat.a• hiOala uww Iner4 tym. run marceetme criams tsunami MI some To *Moo. Marra ,n' rameuramm Ina an awe*, ?obit ens *cwmen wry v•Xos.. iss.fra ten era twain so•r4Wid• 5e N~.m—nu Lao re eke. Please sign a MO dal, here for co

ain. Federal Universal Service Fund. The eareeral Mammal Service Fond (FUSF) is nal a we or government aseartarnant knitted directly ai he ontomer. Carden, ate pernitoth but 001 rebuked b charge their customers for FUSF. We charge the FUSE based one porteelege Of your wird eta service charges. A cenlri

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1,

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require 'complete diversity' of cit