Epstein Secrets

ever, the Court should be aware that DEs 165-3, 185-2 and 185-15 are pleadings that were stricken pursuant to Rule 12(0 by U.S. District Court Judge Marra and thus are not, as Plaintiff claims, "publicly available on the docket of Doe v. United States, 08-cv- 80736 (S.D.Fla.)." Resp. at 15 n.5. These t

, 39, and 49. DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 611' day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 EFTA00075003

cken pursuant to Rule 12(0 by U.S. District Court Judge Marra and thus are not, as Plaintiff claims, "publicly

parties, the court must consider "the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute." 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially adva

r filed charges against Jeffrey Epstein or any other person involved in criminal activity with Ms.M. 14. In the Jane Doe suit, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra allowed limited discovery. Exhibits 1 and 2 were listed on a privilege log and provided to Judge Marra in camera for review. The United States asse

Jane Doe suit, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra allowed limited discovery. Exhibits 1 and 2 were listed on a privilege log and provided to Judge Marra in camera for review. The United States asserted that the items should not be produced because they were governed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) and incl

2 were listed on a privilege log and provided to Judge Marra in camera for review. The United States asserted

position that the work-product immunity applied only to documents prepared in direct relation to the case at bar," 8 Wright, Miller & Marcus, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 2024, p. 518 (3d ed. 2010), more recent cases "have generally found that documents produced in anticipation of litigating one case remain prot

6, 39, and 49. DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 EFTA00210139

Florida, this 6ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 EFTA00210139

parties, the court must consider "the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute." 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially adva

Order at DE 326; DE 268 is hereby UNSEALED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6ih day July, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United State District Judge 25 EFTA00210164 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 330 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2015 Page 26 of 51 TABLE Detail o

y, Florida, this 6ih day July, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United State District Judge 25 EFTA00210164

position that the work-product immunity applied only to documents prepared in direct relation to the case at bar," 8 Wright, Miller & Marcus, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 2024, p. 518 (3d ed. 2010), more recent cases "have generally found that documents produced in anticipation of litigating one case remain prot

6, 39, and 49. DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 EFTA00210568

Florida, this 6ih day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 EFTA00210568

parties, the court must consider "the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute." 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially adva

mas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, FL. JUDGES: KENNETH A. MARRA, United State District Judge. OPINION BY: KENNET

ami, FL. For The Palm Beach Post, Palm Beach Daily News, Intervenors: Rachel Elise Fugate, LEAD ATTORNEY, Thomas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, FL. JUDGES: KENNETH A. MARRA, United State District Judge. OPINION BY: KENNETH A. MARRA OPINION OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court on various discovery related

subsequent litigation." 462 U.S. 19, 25, 103 S. Ct. 2209, 76 L. Ed. 2d 387 (1983) (emphasis in original); see also 8 Wright, Miller & Marcus, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 2024, p. 519 n.47 (3d ed. 2010) (collecting cases). Similarly, the work-product doctrine applies regardless of whether litigation actually en

Order at DE 326; DE 268 is hereby UNSEALED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 611' day July, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United State District Judge 25 EFTA_R1_0 1293460 EFTA02335922 Case 9 08-cv-80736-KAM Document 330 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2015 Page 26 of

, Florida, this 611' day July, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United State District Judge 25 EFTA_R1_0 12934

position that the work-product immunity applied only to documents prepared in direct relation to the case at bar," 8 Wright, Miller & Marcus, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 2024, p. 518 (3d ed. 2010), more recent cases "have generally found that documents produced in anticipation of litigating one case remain prot

39, and 49. • DE 293, in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 61h day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 GIUFFRE002853 EFTA00097416

Florida, this 61h day of April, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 10 GIUFFRE002853

parties, the court must consider "the importance of the amendment on the proper determination of the merits of a dispute." 6 Wright & Miller, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 1488, p. 814 (3d ed. 2010). Justice does not require amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially adva

Order at DE 326; DE 268 is hereby UNSEALED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 6ih day July, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United State District Judge 25 EFTA01657776 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 330 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2015 Page 26 of 51 TABLE Detail o

y, Florida, this 6ih day July, 2015. KENNETH A. MARRA United State District Judge 25 EFTA01657776

position that the work-product immunity applied only to documents prepared in direct relation to the case at bar," 8 Wright, Miller & Marcus, Fed. Prac. & Fed. P. § 2024, p. 518 (3d ed. 2010), more recent cases "have generally found that documents produced in anticipation of litigating one case remain prot