Epstein Secrets

te court and some in federal court. Other identified victims have also filed suit, and a number of those lawsuits are consolidated in front of Judge Marra in the U.S. District Court. In connection with those federal civil suits, a subpoena was issued to Alfredo Rodriguez to appear for a deposition and

er of those lawsuits are consolidated in front of Judge Marra in the U.S. District Court. In connection with t

l information and material known to the Government which may be favorable to the defendant on the issues of guilt or punishment within the scope of Brady I. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United States'. Azurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). D. The Government shall disclose to the defendant(s) the existence and substanc

of their intent to use the correspondence. The notice specifically covered this CVRA action: [A]s you know, there is currently pending before Judge Marra a case filed under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, in which two victims of sexual assault by [you] allege they were deprive

[A]s you know, there is currently pending before Judge Marra a case filed under the Crime Victims' Rights Act

and "respect for the victim's dignity and privacy" have created a substantive due process right. Similarly unavailing is petitioners' reliance upon Brady I. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and other criminal law cases finding a due process obligation on the government's part to disclose exculpatory and impeachment

requited under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(aXI)(A). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of March, 2011. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 08-80736-CV-MARRA 000917 EFTA00230741 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page

CV-MARRA 000929 EFTA00230753 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 4 of 10 On October 20, 2010, this Court (Marra, J.), entered an order (Doc. #222) remanding to the magistrate judge to give Epstein an opportunity to file a reply brief. On November 1, 2010, Eps

21/2011 Page 6 of 15 information contrary to its position in court. For criminal defendants, this principle traces back to the landmark decision of Brady I. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963), in which the Court explained the production of exculpatory evidence is a principle designed for avoidance of an unfair tri