Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00799402

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

u were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-1

ROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out the extent that you were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-18. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 216; line 19-20. Q: Has Ms.—have you

put you in a position where you would not have been able to, nor would you have proceeded with questions today. Id. at page 100; lines 20-23. MR. HADDAD: We wouldn't even — no, as long as it's pending before the Court, I saw no purpose in having to reestablish that you were objecting. Id. at page 100

EFTA00617907

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

7NG SERVICE, INC. . - 7 S11,17i-i995 1431Sel'OnlileicliRep—mtinie.ac EFTA00617921 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 case is pending before Judge Marra. And one of the threshold issues in that case was whether victims rights attach prior to the filing of a federal indictment. And Judge Marra ruled

0 11 12 13 14 15 16 case is pending before Judge Marra. And one of the threshold issues in that case wa

al amount. I reject it also because of the presence of the Etchaverria case and the other case that involves the law firm that slips my mind. MS. HADDAD: Levin. THE COURT: The Levin case. So there was language principally used in the Wolfe case -- that's the underlying case that you primarily reli

EFTA00585394

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ROLA: Same objection. Id. at page 216; line 14. Q: And I will separate out the extent that you were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-18. 11 Tonja Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585404 MR. SCAROLA

u were at the June 12th 2009 hearing in front of Judge Marra where she was present. Id. at page 216; line 15-1