Epstein Secrets

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-C1V- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

Federal authority regarding the interpretation and application of its Acts, citing 18 U.S.C. 1961, et seq. and Fla. Stat. 772.104); O'Malley v. St.. Thomas Univ.. Inc., 599 So.2d 999, 1000 (Ha. 3d DCA 1992)("Since Florida Rico is patterned after Federal RICO. . . .[f]ederal decisions should be accorded great weigh

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-C1V- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

Federal authority regarding the interpretation and application of its Acts, citing 18 U.S.C. 1961, et seq. and Fla. Stat. 772.104); O'Malley v. St.. Thomas Univ.. Inc., 599 So.2d 999, 1000 (Ha. 3d DCA 1992)("Since Florida Rico is patterned after Federal RICO. . . .[f]ederal decisions should be accorded great weigh

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

ed in State Court under Florida RICO alleging they were terminated because they refused to participate in alleged RICO violations. O'Malley v. St.. Thomas Univ.. Inc., 599 So.2d at 1000. The Court adopted the 1 1 th Circuit's reasoning, and stated that any injuries sustained (e.g., by virtue of being terminated) w