3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
ane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson, which was brought for several purposes,
ge or benefit which may be waived; (2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. Goodwin v. Blu Murray Ins. Agency, Inc., 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Epstein clearly waived any argument that the 2008 Doe v. United States proceeding impeded
ane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson, which was brought for several purposes,
d for October 3, 2017 Page 4 of 8 (2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. Goodwin v. Blu Murray Ins. Agency, Inc., 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Epstein clearly waived any argument that the 2008 Doe v. United States proceeding impeded
ane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson which was brought for several purposes,
ge or benefit which may be waived; (2) the actual or constructive knowledge of the right; and (3) the intention to relinquish the right. Goodwin v. Blu Murray Ins. Agency. Inc. 939 So. 2d 1098, 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Epstein clearly waived any argument that the Doe v. United States proceeding justifies a s
Entities connected to both Kenneth Marra and Blu Murray Ins

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATIONPalm Beach Lakes Boulevard
LOCATION
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
ORGANIZATIONMarra/Johnson
ORGANIZATIONTonja Haddad Coleman
PERSONMarc S. Nurik
PERSONFred Haddad
PERSONGoodwin
PERSONthe Federal Court
ORGANIZATION
William Chester Brewer
PERSONBurlington & Rockenbach
ORGANIZATIONHealth & Rehab
ORGANIZATION