Epstein Secrets

arra. 4. On 411k 25, 009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders 0 in this matter of hic

ARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. O C. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Fl In der Seal- Civ-Marra), Kenneth A. Marra, Judge. PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS Petitioners, EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, by and through their undersigned counsel, fi

3. This nutter is pen4t, Ifore the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On 411k 25, 009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders 0 in this matter of hich are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. t forth in the Orders, Judge Mama order

hat all deadlines in this Order arc satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 016 EFTA00795673 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On March 25, 20O9 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5. As set forth in the Orders, J

ra. 4. On March 25, 20O9 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies o

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00729489 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

es. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies o

DWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, Petitioners. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Under Seal- Civ-Marra), Kenneth A. Marra, Judge. PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EMERGENCY WRIT OF MANDAMUS Petitioners, EDWARD MORSE and CAROL MORSE, by and through their undersigned counsel, fi

This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Mires. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5. _ As set forth in the Orders,

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00193900 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5. _ As set forth in the Orders,

ra. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies o

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00223353 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may bo enforced in either venue; and 29

nvestigate and get, so to speak, the dirt. 3 We know that they — that he did wiretapping. 4 And we also know that he forged an order by 5 Judge Marra in Federal Court, among other items. 6 What we do know is that they, more likely than not, 7 sold an interest either in settled or nonsettled 8

And we also know that he forged an order by 5 Judge Marra in Federal Court, among other items. 6 What we

ITTON: Judge, I think, from a 20 practical standpoint, with regard to the 21 preservation of evidence, the Federal Court order 22 takes care of the Federal Court did not deal 23 with Mr. Edwards at all; although, he was agreeable 24 to entering into a preservation order, because they 25 said it appears t

And 24 we have an order of the court by — Judge Marra 25 entered an order that we need to meet and co

tman. And 24 we have an order of the court by — Judge Marra 25 entered an order that we need to meet and co

that order was entered prior to Mr. Stettin being appointed last week, so... 711E COURT: All right. MR. LICHTMAN: Your Honor, we repie:,ented to the Federal Court and the state court that of course we're preserving evidence. THE COURT: Okay. All right. Is there anyone else that wishes to be heard? No. So w

ane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson, which was brought for several purposes,

tes case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Edwards only days before a scheduled

ane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson, which was brought for several purposes,

tes case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Edwards only days before a scheduled

ane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson which was brought for several purposes,

vernment's response to the Doe petition, confirming her belief that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") should be declared illegal and that the Federal Court should "direct the Government to proceed to negotiate a new agreement — in a process that respects Petitioner's (and the other victims') rights."'