Epstein Secrets

counsel, the settlement conference to be convened in this matter. The right to participate in the settlement conference flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene as of right at the remedy stage of these proceedings to advocate for why the remedy in this case—to

the settlement conference flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene

of criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non-Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7, 2008) at note 2, ava

t touching on remedy. Granting Mr. Epstein, through counsel, the right to participate in the settlement conference is necessary to effectuate Judge Marra's order granting Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene as of right at the remedy stage of these proceedings and Judge Marra's grant of permissive inter

settlement conference is necessary to effectuate Judge Marra's order granting Mr. Epstein's motion to interve

al criminal charges. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non—Prosecution Agreements with Corporations 9 EFTA00211551 Case 9:08-c

ement" (an amendment that still does not clearly require that CVRA rights apply to a Non- Prosecution Agreement), Motion at 48, fn 175. Despite Judge Marra's determinations that the CVRA rights are applicable in the absence of a formal federal charge, see e.g. Dkt 189 at 8, the USAO was acting consiste

ecution Agreement), Motion at 48, fn 175. Despite Judge Marra's determinations that the CVRA rights are applic

tead it was the norm. See Memorandum from Craig S. Morford, Acting Deputy Att'y Gen., U.S. Dept of Justice, to Heads of Department Components, U.S. Att'ys re: Selection and Use of Monitors in Deferred Prosecution Agreements and Non— Prosecution Agreements with Corporations (Mar. 7. 2008) at note 2 avail