Epstein Secrets

80119-KAM Document 305-11 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 2 of 2 Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein Page 2 DONE and ORDERED this day of .2009. Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge Courtesy Copies: Counsel of Record 09/12/2019 P CONFIDE CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

D and ADJUDGED that: Defendant's motion is hereby GRANTED: Plaintiff shall pay sanctions in the amount of S in costs and S in fees directly to Burman, Critton, Luther and Coleman within 10 days, and further directs that the Plaintiff make herself available for deposition no later than October , 2009 begi

RN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 — MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTE

being duly sworn, deposes and says: I. I, Thaddeus Knowles, am a licensed investigator in the State of Florida. I was employed by the law firm of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP., relative to the above matter. 2. I have read Plaintiff's Emergency Motion For Hearing Finding That Epstein Is In Civil

010 JANE DOE JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case: 08-80893CIV-MARRA/.I.= Southern Ref: Doe v. Epstein 2010009155 6/

: 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB Palm Beach Ref: ay. Epstein Page 1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.odffactonbcom EFTA00729383 STATEMENT: Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman 7/14/2010 Invoice Inv. Date Person Served Amount Status 2010008854 6/21/2010 IMI. Surveillance, OM 7,623.51 Current I

aration for hearing 3.00 hr $1,500.00 04/01/2009 RDC Telephone conference with Jack G re: Bob J 0.20 hr $100.00 04/01/2009 RDC Hearing with Marra; conference with Brad; conference with Jack 2.10 hr $1,050.00 04/01/2009 RDC Conference with Pike and JMB re: discovery; telephone conference wi

BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 TELEPHONE (561) 842-2820 FAX (561) 844-6929 mailebelclaw.com EFTA00602002 AMENDED REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT The law firm of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP (hereinafter "Firm") will provide multiple representation of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "client" or "you") in the followin

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

appeared Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., having personal knowledge and being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. 1, Robert Critton, and the law firm of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP represent Mr. Epstein's in the civil cases and claims asserted against him in this and related actions. 2. It was and is

ite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); see also, e.g., Banco, 400 F.3d at 1312; AVVA-BC, 25 So.

copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by facsimile and United States mail to: Robert D. Critton, Esquire and Michael J. Pike, Esquire, Burman, Critton, et al., Attorneys for Defendant, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 123'4- day of December, 2008. THE LAW O

ite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); see also, e.g., Banco, 400 F.3d at 1312; AVVA-BC, 25 So.

copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by facsimile and United States mail to: Robert D. Critton, Esquire and Michael J. Pike, Esquire, Burman, Critton, et al., Attorneys for Defendant, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this '23c4- day of December, 2008. THE LAW O

ite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); see also, e.g., Blinco, 400 F.3d at 1312; AVVA-BC, 25 So.

copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by facsimile and United States mail to: Robert D. Critton, Esquire and Michael J. Pike, Esquire, Burman, Critton, et al., Attorneys for Defendant, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 123'4- day of December, 2008. THE LAW O

ite to rescission is placing the other party in status quo"); Renfrow v. First Mortg. America, Inc., 2011 WL 2416247, *3 (S.D. Fla. June 13, 2011) (Marra, J.) ("restoring the parties to the status quo ante is an element of a rescission claim"); see also, e.g., Banco, 400 F.3d at 1312; AVVA-BC, 25 So.

copy of the above and foregoing has been provided by facsimile and United States mail to: Robert D. Critton, Esquire and Michael J. Pike, Esquire, Burman, Critton, et al., Attorneys for Defendant, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401, this 2.3c4- day of December, 2008. ...ualmil