Epstein Secrets

2008) 07/16/2008 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against Defendant. Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/16/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/16/2008) EFTA00222622 Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 07:1672008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED ST

outhern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Internal Use Only Doe No. 3'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Case: 9:08-cv-80119—KAM Cause: 28:1332 Diversity—Personal Injury Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Date Filed: 03/05/2008 Jury Dem

T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY

R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with th

CT. S.D. OF HA. • MIAMI CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("J

008) 07/16/2008 22, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against Defendant. Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/16/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/16/2008) EFTA00222694 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07,17'2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED ST

.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with th

16/2008 Page 3 of 3 entry of this Order. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this le day of July, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: all counsel of record 3 EFTA00222669

T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY

.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with th

ime. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 4 day of August, 2008. th _________________________________ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: all counsel of record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2008 P

. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the

July, 2008. th _________________________________ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to:

inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “The right to inspect

. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the

h CM/ECF at the earliest possible time. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 4ih day of August, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: all counsel of record 2 EFTA00014186