Epstein Secrets

eep True Name in Sealed Envelope filed by Jane Doe, 2 MOTION to Proceed Anonymously filed by Jane Doe. Responses due by 10/15/2008. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/30/08. (ir) (Entered: 09/30/2008) 10/01/2008 10. r 459.6 KB MOTION FOR EXTENSTION OF TIME TO RESPOND to I Complaint Extension to Respond to

. https://e,ef.flsd.useourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.p17859999798355213-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA00175425 CM/ECE 'Live Database - flsd Page 11 of 12 Marra on 6/1/2009. (1c3) (Entered: 06/01/2009) 06/03/2009 77 r 160.9 KB Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 38 Amended Com

5 U.S.. at 613. and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237., Fisher, 425 U.S.. at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569., id. at 428. 432. 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. 1487 U.S.,1 at EFTA00175464 • Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 7 of 11 Doe 101 v.

attorneys have no objection to an order to preserve evidence similar to the one entered in the case of Doe v. Epstein, et al, Case No. 08-80804-CIV- MARRA/JOHNSON, [DE 20], and attached hereto as Exhibit A. EPSTEIN's attorneys are unaware of any items referenced in Plaintiffs' motion, 55-6, having been

465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id, at 428. 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, 1487 U.S.,I at EFTA00221594 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 151 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 7 of 11 Doe 101 v. Ep

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 123T Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id., at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, 1487 U.S..'! at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; J id.,1 at 122, 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fif

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

465 U.S., at 613. and n. 11. 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher. 425 U.S., at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569; id. at 428. 432. 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. [487 U.S..1 at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; J id.] at 122. 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEI

30 causesabeftemenmisn R9seurniitilit51712 EngigMergrl-PPRP098(PkWago9 PatoRN 4 #24 C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al. Page 11 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. 1487 U.S.,1 at 104. 108 S.Ct. 2284; f id..I at 122. 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fift

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY

465 U.S., at 613. and n. 11. 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher. 425 U.S., at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569; id. at 428. 432. 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. [487 U.S..1 at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; J id.] at 122. 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth