Epstein Secrets

g so absolutely 22 no contact could occur between he and 23 Mr. Horowitz and his client nor anyone else. 24 Until the court, until either Judge Marra or 25 Judge Johnson ruled on the issue as to whether 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pa

0119-KAM Document 305-11 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 2 of 2 Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein Page 2 DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2009. Kenneth A. Marta United States District Judge Courtesy Copies: Counsel of Record EFTA00182071 STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY E EPSTEIN, W/M, 01/2011953, IN THE

r anyone else. 24 Until the court, until either Judge Marra or 25 Judge Johnson ruled on the issue as to wh

cally, with regard to Jane Doe No. 4, which is the deposition set for next week, September 16, 2009, the plaintiff has in her past (see affidavit of Richard C.W. Hall, M.D., an expert psychiatrist retained by Defendant to conduct exams on various claimants.) aet Exhibit "5" A B. C. EFTA00182048 Case 9:08-cv

utely 21 22 no contact could mew between he and 22 23 Mr. Horowitz and his client nor anyone else. 23 24 Until the court, until either Judge Marra or 24 25 Judge Johnson nded on the issue as to whether 25 Page 7 1 or not he could appear at the depositions of 2 not only Jane Doe 4 but an

yone else. 23 24 Until the court, until either Judge Marra or 24 25 Judge Johnson nded on the issue as to

cally, with regard to Jane Doe No. 4, which is the deposition set for next week, September 16, 2009, the plaintiff has in her past (see affidavit of Richard C.W. Hall, M.D., an expert psychiatrist retained by Defendant to conduct exams on various claimants.) Exhibit "5" A. Sought counseling due to a dysfunctiona

009 Copies furnished to: all counsel of record KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 1See infra, excerp

Jane -qoe_ #~ v_ Jeffrey Epstein AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD C.W. HALL, M.D. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEMINOLE On t

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

nsic psychiatric expert, Dr. Kliman, including videotaped interviews of Plaintiffs, which have been provided to and used by the Defendant's expert, Richard C.W. Hall, M.D.2 Defendant therefore is not by any stretch being unreasonably delayed or thwarted in obtaining nonparty discovery through the rules of civil p

F FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-cv-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defend

have experienced several incidents in their lives which affected them emotionally and psychologically. See g., Exhibits "C" and "D", Affidavits of Richard C.W. Hall, outlining the psychological issues experienced by Jane Does 4 and 6 as a result of incidents in their lives prior to Epstein, which cannot be disc