6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
9 / 6
Mentions
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do
TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do
s or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead,
4th day of March, 2010. LINNEA R. JOHNSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Hon. Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 480 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/04/2010 Page 10 of 10
D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Hon. Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead, the privilege must be asserted in response to a particular question, and in each instance the burden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do
TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Do
s or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead,
UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFRE
ould be a surprise to you, based 24 upon at least what you —your impression is from 25 Justin; is that correct? Page 172 1 COURT REPORTER: And Sprague? 2 THE WITNESS: I don't know his last name — 3 MR. CRITTON: S-p-r-a-g-u-e, I believe. 4 That's how I've seen it answered in 5 interrogatories.
RN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTE
d not say "no" to Epstein. Jane Doc made a conscious decision not to have intercourse or oral sex with Epstein. Jane Doe's sexual experiences with Sprague during that same time period demonstrate that she chose to engage in those acts with him, but would not do the same with Epstein. For the same reas
010 JANE DOE JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case: 08-80893CIV-MARRA/.I.= Southern Ref: Doe v. Epstein 2010009155 6/
7/6/2010 Benz, Devon 58.00 Current JANE DOE JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case: 08-80893CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Southern Ref: Doe v. Epstein 2010009677 7/8/2010 Sprague, Justin 255.88 Current JANE DOE JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case: 08.80893CIV-MARRNJOHNSON Southern Ref: Doe v. Epstein 2010009678 7/1/2010 Special., MS,
Entities connected to both Kenneth Marra and Sprague

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONLinnea R. Johnson
PERSON
Juan Alessi
PERSON
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Bernie Sanders
PERSON