Epstein Secrets

CT. S.D. OF HA. • MIAMI CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("J

008) 07/16/2008 22, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against Defendant. Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/16/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/16/2008) EFTA00222694 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07,17'2008 Page 1 of 4 UNITED ST

ction pursuant to a criminal statute that provides no civil remedy, her complaint is properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. See Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping where "the ment

Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmukumALINVBSTIOMOR

me Assurance Co. v. Plaza Materials Corp., 908 So.2d 360, 374 (Fla. 2005) 2. Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Ferre, 636 F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) 3. Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) 4. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) 5. Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla

Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmemeom. I INVBSTIOM

me Assurance Co. v. Plaza Materials Corp., 908 So.2d 360, 374 (Fla. 2005) 2. Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. Ferre, 636 F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) 3. Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) 4. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) 5. Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

ction pursuant to a criminal statute that provides no civil remedy, her complaint is properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. See Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping where "the ment

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

ction pursuant to a criminal statute that provides no civil remedy, her complaint is properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. See Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping where "the ment

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1,

Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action for damages); Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping where "the ment

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE N1,

Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action for damages); Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping where "the ment

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, aik/a JANE DOE #1,

Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action for damages); Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Ha. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs claim for parental kidnapping where "the mentio

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80804-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1,

Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action for damages); Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Ha. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs claim for parental kidnapping where "the mentio