Epstein Secrets

f our 18 investigation of the surrounding allegations? Just 19 did you read that response? I believe it was filed 20 January 21, 2015, in Judge Marra's courtroom. 21 A. I don't recall reading a 150-page 22 document. My lawyer Kendall Coffey would have read 23 it. It's possible I read it. But

I believe it was filed 20 January 21, 2015, in Judge Marra's courtroom. 21 A. I don't recall reading a 15

talk about my client being presumed 14 innocent, my client being innocent. That's part of 15 the role of a criminal defense lawyer. Justice 16 Blackmun has said that the criminal defense lawyer's 17 role does not end in a courtroom, it continues to 18 the courthouse steps. 19 And so when my cli

ions to Epstein's Motion to Compel and/or Identify. This Notice should only be filed in 08-80119, not in all of the Epstein cases.. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 5/20/2009. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al. (1c3) (Entered: 05/20/2009) 05/22/2009 15 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruc

No. 102 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Member case: (View

statutory enactments is simply not present here, and the record is devoid of any factual material that would support such a conclusion.10 As Justice Blackmun said in dissent in Landsgraf, there is no vested right to break the law." Bottom line is, a motion to dismiss a claim is not the correct procedural

EIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED'

when there is a parallel state action. In that case, a bare majority of one held upheld the District Court's decision to abstain, however, Justice Blackmun, in casting the deciding vote, did so because he was of the opinion that the remedy sought (mandamus) was premature, since the Appellate Court whic

EIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDU

when there is a parallel state action. In that case, a bare majority of one held upheld the District Court's decision to abstain, however, Justice Blackmun, in casting the deciding vote, did so because he was of the opinion that the remedy sought (mandamus) was premature, since the Appellate Court whic