Epstein Secrets

542075 E-mail: GG5cc EFTA00722655 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/09/2009 Page 2 of 3 Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 — MARRA/JOHNSON DATED: April 9, 2009 Respectfully Submitted, Plaintiff, by One of Her Counsel, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards IN ROSENFELDT A

ion for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law. DONE AND ORDERED this day of , 2009. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies to all Counsel of Record EFTA00722686 Barbara McKenna From: Sent: .ay, l'Alltiblitaliklattlic To: fisd_

r inequity in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to someone else." Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936). A civil defendant who asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege "may have to accept certain bad conseq

ERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTE

r inequity in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to someone else." Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S.. 248, 255 (1936). A civil defendant who asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege "may have to accept certain bad conse

s in LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson; deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23, line 4; p. 38, line 22. R. 809-10, citing amended complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scot

the record." Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So. 2d 638, 644 (Fla.1999). "This rule applies in cases of summary judgments as well." Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1051, 1053 (Fla. 1989); see also Rivernider, supra (holding that although trial judge erred in granting summary ju

ERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 08-CIV-80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, 1. Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTE

r inequity in being required to go forward, if there is even a fair possibility that the stay for which he prays will work damage to someone else." Landis'. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936). A civil defendant who asserts the Fifth Amendment privilege "may have to accept certain bad consequ