Epstein Secrets

ecutors to turn over documents about plea discussions with Epstein. The decision also lifted an appellate stay on the ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra in West Palm Beach to allow the release of documents to the women, identified in court papers only as Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2. The women

erly Martin and U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell of Orlando, sitting by designation. The U.S. attorneys office in Miami argued before Marra that the victims did not need to be notified of the agreement because the women's liberty was not at stake. It also took the position that the Crim

Hardman said. Caned argued that the laps Is %Nicer in showing Epstelne lack el remorse,' Cassell described Epstein as a pitiless sexual abuser to Janet/co siva al least 30 other minor gins Even though Jane Doe Is not mired to by name on the laps Epstein miens to ass victims as 'the girls' and makes

DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 Case No. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON 3 4 5 JANE DOE, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs

pose of taking the videotape 13 14 deposition of taken in Case Number 08-CIV-80893, ane oe v. effrey Epstein, el. al. 15 The court reporter is Janet. McKinney; the 16 videographer is Sean McGuire, both of V.S. Legal 17 Support. 18 Will counsel and all present please introduce 19 yourself a

admissions. that Epstein may have made regarding Jane * Doe or. other minors girls: Additionally, we have

eement was described during a hearing held before Judge Marra on the Crime Victims’ Rights Act action that I ha

agreement. My clients did not learn and understand this fact until July 11, 2008, when the agreement was described during a hearing held before Judge Marra on the Crime Victims’ Rights Act action that I had filed. In the summer of 2008 I filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of i, E.W., and