Epstein Secrets

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-C1V- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

tional distress, anguish, shock, nervousness, pain and EFTA00729112 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 4 suffering) are not recoverable under RICO), citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personal injuries). M. at 348. Plaintiff cannot argue

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-C1V- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

tional distress, anguish, shock, nervousness, pain and EFTA00729107 Doe v. Epstein Page No. 4 suffering) are not recoverable under RICO), citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personal injuries). M. at 348. Plaintiff cannot argue

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

rial court's ruling — general damages (emotional distress, anguish, shock, nervousness, pain and suffering) are not recoverable under RICO), citing Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate Group, 834 F.2d 1163, 1169 (3d Cir. 1987)(congress intended RICO to exclude personnel injuries). 14. at 348. In Connor v. Halifax