Epstein Secrets

ton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (I) David

sor, constitutional attomey and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); (iii)Bill Clinton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (I) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTE

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Ha. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to t

or, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); (iii)Bill Clinton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTE

ton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

or, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); (iii)Bill Clinton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTE

ton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and ■.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to th

ton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David

constitutional attorney . and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); (iii)Bill Clinton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTE

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and ■.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to th

ton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and J) David

professor, constitutional attorney . and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); Clinton (Former President of the United States); (iv)Tommy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and J) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTEI

TEIN, EDWARDS and L.M. possessed ulterior motives or purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process. 72. As a result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s actions, EPSTEIN suffered damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a judgment for damages against all th

rd Law professor, constitutional attorney and one of EPSTEIN'S criminal defense attorneys); ill Clinton (Former President of the United States); T mmy Mottola (former President of Sony Record); and (v) David Copperfield (illusionist). 39. The above-named individuals were friends and acquaintances of EPSTE

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to