Epstein Secrets

and Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶14. 73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exh

robative in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶21. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00726030 have run a

and Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶14. 73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law finn of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exh

in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and Edwards's settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 121. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00081213 Case 9:08-

and Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at /14. 73. Epstein's complaint alleges that Edwards provided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exh

in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and Edwards's settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 121. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00188897 Case 9:08-