Epstein Secrets

ou about the people you named. 13 A. What do you mean by *personal relationship," 13 Have you had a social relationship with Tommy 14 sir? 14 Mottola? 15 Q. Have you socialized with him? 15 A. The names in my Complaint are strictly as a 16 A. Yes, sir. 16 reaction to the abusive discovery p

and 14th Amendment Rights. 7 Copperfield? 8 BY MR. SCAROLA: 8 A. As a reaction to, once again, the abusive 9 Q. Have you ever socialized with Tommy Mottola`. 9 discovery process of bringing in names of people that 10 A. This is the type of questions where people who 10 have absolutely nothing to do

mplaint, I'm asking you about the people you named. 13 A. What do you mean by *personal relationship," 13 Have you had a social relationship with Tommy 14 sir? 14 Mottola? 15 Q. Have you socialized with him? 15 A. The names in my Complaint are strictly as a 16 A. Yes, sir. 16 reaction to th

44 22 one: 22 23 (Via tekpbone) 23 24 24 25 25 Page 6 Page 8 I Appearances contimied... 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 On behalf of the Plaintiff. Jane Doe II: 3 ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA, ESQUIRE 2 — — — GARCIA EI.K1NS & BOEHRINGER 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video 4 I record. This is Media No.

of Undisputed Facts. • Complaint ¶38(iv): With regard to former Sony Record executive Tommy Mottola, Edwards was not the attorney that noticed Mr. Mottola's deposition. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. • Complaint ¶38(v): With regard to illusionist David Copperfield, Edwards had sound legal basis

ton had relevant and discoverable information. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. • Complaint ¶38(iv): With regard to former Sony Record executive Tommy Mottola, Edwards was not the attorney that noticed Mr. Mottola's deposition. See Statement of Undisputed Facts. • Complaint ¶38(v): With regard to illusi

, 08-80802), . (Case No.08-80811), Jane Does Nos. 101, 102 and 103 (Case Nos. 09-80591, 09-80656, 10-80309), another Jane Doe (Case No. 08-80804), Jane Doe II (Case No. 09-80469), as well as other non-filed claims. Furthermore, Defendant has also resolved three state court claims. The only cases not resolv

Edwards Robert C. Josefsberg Hearing to Un-seal Joint-privilege 06702-06705 09/16/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola depos Joint-privilege 06706-06708 10/14/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege 06715-06719 10/09/2009

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

Edwards Robert C. Josefsberg Hearing to Un-seal Joint-privilege 06702-06705 09/16/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview & Tommy Matola depos Joint-privilege 06706-06708 10/14/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Kikka M. Claudio Igor Zinoview depo Joint-privilege 06715-06719 10/09/2009

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/