Epstein Secrets

carefully considering your request, I have decided, in my capacity as the First Assistant U.S. Attorney, not to make an exception here. Regarding the Landon Thomas matter, Mr. Thomas was given, pursuant to his request, non-case specific information concerning specific federal statutes. Regarding the offer to

quest, I have decided, in my capacity as the First Assistant U.S. Attorney, not to make an exception here. Regarding the Landon Thomas matter, Mr. Thomas was given, pursuant to his request, non-case specific information concerning specific federal statutes. Regarding the offer to extend the current

S cial t F.B.I. , Victim-Witness Coordinator, U.S. Attorneys Office Zoos EFTA00289853 10/25/07 THU 15:1S PAZ 505 530 0440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE U.S. Department orJarttee United States Attorney Southern District of Florida F0 run 99NA. eStrern Alkyd, Fl 33132 Tidephofte: 005)961-9299 FacrimIle: O0)O0-6

ith the Epstein matter began on January 2, 2008 and ended on January 7, 2008.'2 Specifically, his contact involved five telephone conversation with Landon Thomas, a reporter for the New York Times. These conversations occurred on I) the morning of January 2, 2008, 2) the afternoon of January 2, 2008, 3) the

ential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product -9- EFTA00225186 A. The Morning of January 2, 2008. AUSA Weinstein began his conversation with Mr. Thomas by explaining that he was the acting PIO for the week and that he had received Mr.Thomas's December 31, 2007 e-mail requesting an interview and ask

U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY BPSTER4 GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY A ANCHEZ, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00225211 U.S. Department nfitist ire United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITEDSTATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Lilly Ann Sanche

Study Purpose Des r Samp e F nd ngs Summary Easton (2013) McE vaney. Greene. and Hogan (2012) Sthonbucher, Ma er, Moh er-Kuo, Schnyder, and Lando t (20 I 2) Study purpose was to descr be ma e CSA d sc osure processes us ng a fe span approach exam n ng d fferences based on age. A so. to e

& Perrone. P A. (2000). Reporting sexual assault to the police in Hawaii (NCI 188264. National Criminal Justice Reference Service). Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Ruggiero. K. J.. Smith. D. W. Hanson• R. F.. Resnick. H. S.. Saunders. B. E.. Kilpatrick• D. C.. et al. (2004). Is disclosure of chil