Epstein Secrets

d. On March 11, 2004, JD#1 called Tony at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical worth used in different parts of the same act are in

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

a.m. At 3:38 that afternoon, called Tony at 9:13 M. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 On March 11, 2004

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

d. On March 11, 2004, JD#5 called Tony at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

4. On March 11, 2004, JD#1 called Tony at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,